Sustaind.org is sick. :( If you're a PHP programmer, can you help us upgrade Sustain'd and get it working again? If interested, email richard AT moregoodfoundation DOT org.


This article confronts a growing problem in the Church - members using their blogs to criticize the Church and its leadership

comments

I would hardly call this a "growing problem in the Church." Especially since such so-called "blogs of apostasy" (a title applied by others, not myself) as mine probably have a regular readership of about 3 people.
written by SteveM 764 days ago
    I don't think the concern lies in the regular readership. The issue for me is the many people who find such blogs through the search engines and are introduced to LDS-related things with a negative slant or spin. I praise the efforts of the More Good Foundation to try to prevent this from occuring.
    written by cboyack 764 days ago
    Good thing I wasn't specifically pointing the finger at your or any other blog!
    written by teancum 764 days ago
    Oh, and Connor I hope I did an adequate job of showing that I wasn't mentioning the More Good Foundation or sustaind.org to call them out. I think both sites are awesome!
    written by teancum 764 days ago
    teancum,

    I find it somewhat quizzical that you thought that I thought (following me here? :)) that you were casting MGF and Sustain'd in a negative light. Far from it, I supported your article (and thus Sustain'd it), realizing you were talking about other blogs out there that cast the Church and its leaders in a negative light. I didn't think you were pointing out my own blog either - I sure hope not, for I support and defend the Church and its leaders and this stances (I hope) shows in the things I write about on my blog.

    So, I guess there was miscommunication.
    written by cboyack 763 days ago
    I never thought that you thought that I thought MGF and sustaind.org was being casted in a negative light. Just kidding. What I'm trying to say is I never thought or gathered you thought I was casting them in a negative light. Personally, I wanted to make sure I didn't.
    written by teancum 763 days ago
I can't wait until I get that same sinking feeling that I'm the only one who has questions in the world on the internet as well as in my regular ward
written by canadiancynic 764 days ago
Here's my reply to "Teancum":

You've presented an articulate view of one side of this question, and I appreciate it. I hope you can realize that there are those who differ in their approach to religion. For me, religion is not a warm comfortable blanket used to smother all the doubts I might have. It's more of a vehicle I ride as I navigate life's tricky spots. We all encounter ambiguities and questions in the Church. I feel best when I am free to confront these, discuss them, and learn more about them. In doing this, I grow. In the past I have tried ignoring and stifling these concerns, as counsel in your post has suggested. This feels false and uncomfortable.

I do consider many of those who write what you call "Blogs of Apostasy" to be worthy and active members of the Church. I hope that people with your paradigm will allow us a place in the Church as well as online where we can flourish, instead of pushing us out of the Church and kingdom with well-meaning but intolerant actions and remarks.
written by clbruno 764 days ago
    I have responded to your comment. Thanks for making my blog interesting!
    written by teancum 764 days ago
    Teancum, Now you are backpedaling from your original assertion. On your blog you stated that as you read the articles submitted to Sustain'd "I found myself amazed and sickened. I read several blogs written by members of the Church who used their online voice to criticize church leaders, church curriculum and church history. The authors of these blogs considered themselves worthy and active members despite their articles showing a complete disregard and disrespect for the LDS Church and its leadership." You said that the authors of these blogs were arrogant, apostate, and you called them to repentance. In an attempt to understand your viewpoint, I have surveyed the top articles that had been submitted at the time of your perusal. Most come from an extremely faithful perspective and seem beyond reproach. Some of the more controversial:

    BYU Gets An F in Sex Education

    Primary Songs went Right Over My Head

    Some Lessons Al-Qaida Could Learn

    The Lone Man in the Church

    Why Darwin Matters

    For all the Reid Haters

    Missouri's Mormon Past

    Missionary Malpractice

    Those Who Leave

    In none of these could I find criticism or mocking of Church leaders. The vast majority of blogs reviewed here are reasoned approaches to faith issues. In your comment to me you say that "A sincere and humble person can easily and effectively explore their doubts and disagreements."

    Perhaps it would be helpful if you would identify what you have found that you believe is "mocking and apostate." Those of us who have blogs listed on Sustain'd would like to know exactly who you are calling to repentance.
    written by clbruno 763 days ago
    Sorry. I'm not backpedaling. Maybe I just wasn't clear enough on how I found the blogs because that wasn't the focus of my article. Through sustaind.org I clicked on a few blogs and from those blogs linked to others. I never asserted that sustaind.org was contributing to the blogs I refer to in my article. If I thought that I would not have said:

    "Let me clarify that these articles were not associated with the More Good Foundation or sustaind.org. These websites only acted as portals to these articles. They were in no way maintained or supported by either site. My purpose in mentioning these two sites is to show how I discovered these blogs and to illustrate my intention on finding good material, not searching for bad."

    Is that sufficient?
    written by teancum 763 days ago
    I'd also like to add that no good would come from me pointing a finger and making a list of the blogs that participate in criticizing and mocking the Church.
    written by teancum 763 days ago
    I went ahead and updated the article to better reflect how I found the blogs.
    written by teancum 763 days ago
Connor,

I can't speak for others, but I try not to be overly negative on my blog. I'm very forthcoming about what I love and appreciate in the Church.

But I think the negative trend of many blogs may be a reaction to the exclusively positive light in which the Church is painted in other Mormon forums, as well as the LDS social pressure to not express a divergent opinion in such ituations.

I'm not convinced that it's any more beneficial for someone curious about the Church to stumble across a blog at the other end of the spectrum, one that endlessly glorifies the Church and its leaders.
written by SteveM 764 days ago
    It doesn't have to be one extreme or the other. Just because a blog doesn't present the Church or its leadership in a negative light doesn't mean its presenting it in a glorifying light. I believe you can discuss things about the Church and its leadership in a constructive manner without criticizing and mocking it. I spend a lot of time on fairboards and have had many of these constructive discussions.

    I think the trend is a result of the popularity of blogs rising, and the ease with which someone can use blogs to mock and criticize while remaining nameless and unaccountable.
    written by teancum 764 days ago
Great article. Brought up some great points!
written by topcattonya 764 days ago
My opinion is that it is good to question your beliefs, just draw a line and don't cross it.
written by markm 763 days ago
"It doesn't have to be one extreme or the other. Just because a blog doesn't present the Church or its leadership in a negative light doesn't mean its presenting it in a glorifying light."

You're absolutely right. I never said there wasn't middle ground. I like to believe that there is. I think one can be a loyal member of the Church who gives credit where it's due, and at the same time be unafraid to voice a dissenting opinion.

Unfortunately, many blogs do fall into one extreme or the other.
written by SteveM 763 days ago
    Right, and its the other extreme that my article is referring to.
    written by teancum 763 days ago
Great post, Teancum. We need more people bringing up to attention the fact that apostasy starts by being overly critic.
written by Hhhhh 743 days ago

log in to comment or register here.

who opposed this story


What's Sustain'd?

Sustain'd is a place where people can submit and "sustain" their favorite LDS-oriented web pages. Blog posts, photo pages, church articles, you name it.
read more...

Search Sustain'd

Sustain'd Tools

RSS Feeds