Sustaind.org is sick. :( If you're a PHP programmer, can you help us upgrade Sustain'd and get it working again? If interested, email richard AT moregoodfoundation DOT org.


"A small situation has arisen and I’d love to gather a few letters from folks who feel like Mormon Stories has helped them find a way to remain active in the church when they otherwise might not have." If you enjoy Mormon Stories head on over to John Dehlin's site and express your support for him. He's not worried about this so we probably shouldn't be either, but he could use letters of support.

comments

Yes, I opposed this. John encourages a hollow observance, which is meaningless. To 'stay in the church' without faith is not really staying. I have trouble promothing anything that offers faithless activity as a viable option. Support of faithful reconciliation is what is needed.

I hate taking a stand like this, but until mormonstories can grow up a little and promote actual faith, then I have trouble even tacitly supporting further dissemination and/or support of what he does.

I've angsted about this vote for several days, but as I saw the numbers of sustainings increasing, I decided I had to go ahead and do it.

I have it from a very reliable source that John's a great guy, and I have no doubts that he's acting out of the best of intentions; I just don't think he knows how perverted what he offers is.
written by naiah 608 days ago
I'm interested in this perspective... do you see the church as an all or nothing organization?

Due to my own history research there are some specifics in what are taught in the manuals that I simply cannot accept. So, if the church is all or nothing, I'm out... Indeed, so are many of the apologists, one example: the Limited Geography Theory specifically contradicts what Joseph Smith and others stated about the Book of Mormon.

I'm wondering exactly what your saying here... is membership, or belief in the church an all or nothing thing?
written by canadiancynic 607 days ago
    Nothing in life is as black and white as a saying like "all or nothing," and so I will look beyond your wording to the underlying request to elaborate on my feelings about faith and activity. I sincerely believe that when one has doubts, there may be a time wherein one needs to attend without faith, to rely on obedience in the face of the quandary that is uncertainty, but that that is a stage to be visited moved beyond. Few things in life, and none in faith are static; it's all which way one swims in regard to the currents that swirl about them. By promoting a community of faithless activity, to some degree John removes the impetus to push through the quandary, which I do feel is vital to the whole process.

    I have no wish to enter into a public debate about your or anyone else's doubts, but I can tell you that resolution is possible. It takes a desperately bitter amount of humility, and a willingness to cultivate comfort with the simple phrase "I don't know," (with an implied, "but I know the Lord does" afterward) but it is possible.

    All the best.
    written by naiah 607 days ago
An interesting perspective. (Don't worry about the tone and please look beyond wording... it makes conversation so much easier)

I'm unwilling to be someone who is silent about the doubts that exist in mine an others lives, especially due to the anonymity provided by forums like this. LDS culture is unkind to those who doubt and the pressure to resolve things forces most of us to doubt in secret, a pressure cooker of a life that drives many out of the church for good.

Are you familiar with New Order Mormons? There's a pretty clear consensus among them that their ideas are not tenable for any long period of time. I agree with them.

I've found the DAMU and NOM and like sites have actually encouraged more careful deliberation and reasoned deliberation as to ones decision in regards to the church. Sure there are people who are pissy... but so's the Snarkernacle...lol

Anyway... I can understand a disinclination to debate points of doubt... I'm just unwilling to shut up about it.

All the best to you as well.
written by canadiancynic 607 days ago
    But Ann, the founder of the NOM has found her faith again, at least, from what I've read.
    written by Doc 607 days ago
    Doc- That's the hope (could we say faith) of the unbelieviar who is practising... that they can find their faith again.
    written by canadiancynic 606 days ago
Naiah,

Actually the one thing I appreciate about John is that he never gives up trying to get a grasp on the issues he grapples with. You are correct that for many, myslef included there is a retain faith in our struggles, but it takes some serious wrestling with God to get there. John has made his wrestle public in an effort to reach out to those similarly struggling and to keep them coming to Church. His faith may be far from perfect, and I certainly don't hold to his positions, but he has a sincerity and a certain fair mindedness that commands my respect. Heck, my faith isn't perfect either. I don't know that he is promoting a worldview as much as he is helping people describe their own experience. His agenda insofar as I can see it is to help people understand each other. I think it's a worthy goal. In fact, Naiah, I bet he would love to have you tell your own story about your conversion and how you think these issues can he handled in a much more humble, faith maintaining manner, if you were to ask him. Having followed your own blogging, I think you would do a great job.
written by Doc 607 days ago
What is the small situation?
written by willf 587 days ago
I think that so far the small situation is resolved. His bishop had asked him to come in and discuss the blogs, because of some comments he had received from a bishop who lives in another area of the US. But it sounds as though everything is ok now. One problem was that the bishop had heard that John was representing himself as an official from the church. Turns out that the person who had reported that had John and his brother Joel, the church CIO, mixed up.
written by sootica 586 days ago
I understand the various positions here. Honestly, I just wish the "official" church would be willing to openly discuss the historical issues that exist--instead of just saying "That's in the past." Past or not, the ETERNAL implications of many of these things, lies in the future.
written by AMSmith 558 days ago

log in to comment or register here.

who opposed this story


What's Sustain'd?

Sustain'd is a place where people can submit and "sustain" their favorite LDS-oriented web pages. Blog posts, photo pages, church articles, you name it.
read more...

Search Sustain'd

Sustain'd Tools

RSS Feeds